Just to confirm. I checked the message that was posted to the list and moderated and it was sent by "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" while your subscribed address is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". That is why your message was queued for moderation.
Jeff On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 11:14:47AM -0700, Jeffrey Clement wrote: > > I had posted a message regarding a possible attack on my web server, and got > > a reply indicating the message would be posted to the list once reviewed by > > a moderator. I've never seen this type of message before, so assumed the > > list server is having a minor issue. Of course, I checked the address I > > sent the message to and such, but saw no reason for the response I got. I > > still haven't seen that message on the list - I'll repost it tonight if I > > don't see it by then. > > The problem is that if the address you are sending from does not match, > excactly, the address you subscribed with the message will be flagged as > requiring modertation because we do not allow non-subscribers to post to the > list (too much spam). I believe the list is operating fine it is probably just > that you sent from a different address than you usually use for posting. > > Maybe reply worked because you have some sort of smart "from address" picker > that uses a specific address to reply to messages in the clug folder / mailing > list / etc? I'm not sure what MUA you are using but I know I have behaviour > like this in Mutt. > > > Seeing as a bunch of requests are being made, may I request that all users > > on the list keep in mind that we all have different ways of viewing it? If > > something in particular isn't suitable for the way I view/use the list, that > > doesn't mean that same thing isn't suitable for someone else who may be > > using different tools. > > Yes. Although one needs try and post in ways that the majority of the users > will be able to read the message. This is why we frown upon HTML mail and > such. To keep the majority of MUAs happy and displaying things properly reply > to messages when you continue a thread. If you want to start a new thread one > should just form a new message. > > Jeff > > > Shawn > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of Mike Roest > > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 6:46 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [clug-talk] OT: Request > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hey All, > > I have a quick request, could people please not reply to an existing > > thread to start a new topic. It really screws up those of us who are > > using a threaded MUA. > > > > Thanks > > > > - -- > > Mike > > Site: http://www.blahz.org > > GPG Key: http://www.blahz.org/gpg.asc > > Let us celebrate our agreement with the adding of chocolate to milk. > > - --Homer Simpson > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > > iD8DBQFAXu3+w+I3MvUBM6QRAkuMAJ9jbhvi8IUnmz1zNFD7iKT51p5KJgCdEx4w > > ric9m79KMIG2OEqdEiq/GFI= > > =+IwA > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > clug-talk mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > clug-talk mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > > > > -- > Jeff Clement > http://jclement.ca > _______________________________________________ > clug-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca -- Jeff Clement http://jclement.ca _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
