If you mean the leaked NT/W2K source code, I don't think that the contributions are going back to Microsoft in quite the way they would like. ;-)
Curtis On Tue April 6 2004 13:19, Shawn Grover wrote: > Couldn't the same be said for Windows source code? > > Shawn > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Curtis Sloan > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:31 AM > To: CLUG General > Subject: Re: [clug-talk] Microsoft Posts Tool as Open Source > > <snip> > They also reap the benefits of Open Source (outside contributions > improving the code base). > </snip> > > _______________________________________________ > clug-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
