I have read the reviews about that card, and the performance will be less than 
acceptable. I would be comparable to an nvidia geforce2, and that thing would 
cost around $30-$50 not $100.
Cheers
Szemir

On July 18, 2004 08:26, Andrew Graupe wrote:
> bogi wrote:
> >Also, the hardware manufacturers can tweak their nda-contracts and reduce
> > the fees needed to create the drivers in the first place. Also, they
> > could actually publish the driver specification a few weeks ahead of
> > market-time to allow for the development of free and open-source
> > (drivers) modules for them hadware devices. But sometimes they can't do
> > that, because of some contractual issues, and then the open-source
> > community is left with heavily experimental
> > patch-it-in-on-your-own-kinda-solutions. I had a situation like this
> > years ago, what did i do? Yank the card and get a decent one that has
> > proper modules, bingo, and i do play rtcw at 70-odd frames a second on my
> > 333celeron using an nvidia2.  8-)
>
> That solution crossed my mind, but I didn't feel like going out to the
> store and dropping $100, when it's not even my main gaming PC.  It is
> still in my mind, and if video performance is less than acceptable, I
> know what to do.
>
> >     Cheers
> >     Szemir
> >
> >On July 18, 2004 00:02, Andrew Graupe wrote:
> >>Let me start by saying: I like linux.  I think the world would be better
> >>if everyone used it, and at least a bit more spyware free.  That being
> >>said, I have just spent most of the day trying to get 3D acceleration
> >>with my integrated S3 UniChrome chip.  I will say this in favor of
> >>nVIDIA and ATi, at least they're common enough that people have come up
> >>with workarounds for the various linux bugs.  I write this near
> >>midnight, after a marathon session of patching, kernel recompiles, and
> >>other unpleasantness.  That being said, I will still have to reboot
> >>often if I want optimum performance because gentoo-dev-sources (which is
> >>fast for normal things) can't be patched to work with VIA video chips.
> >>I think I'll stay with this for now.  At least if the Neverwinter Nights
> >>install (the entire reason I'm doing this) goes without a hitch, it will
> >>mean a great advancement in terms of linux games.  I guess we don't hear
> >>about linux games that much because it's so phenomenally hard to get to
> >>this point.
> >>
> >>I don't mean to flame or troll, but this is the truth.  Linux could be a
> >>*TEENSY* bit more userfriendly.  If the patches for VIA support are out
> >>there, why haven't they been merged into the main kernel tree?  I have
> >>to think that VIA is a fairly big value-mobo manufacturer (the PC in
> >>question is an HP; imagine how many are out there), so it's not a fringe
> >>brand.  At least it's done now.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Andrew Graupe
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>clug-talk mailing list
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >clug-talk mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca


_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca

Reply via email to