This is another bold assumption! You obviously haven't the slighest
inkling of what makes a kernel "good" for use as a server. Linux
didn't even provide a reasonably good polling mechanism or native
POSIX threads until the 2.6 series. To be fair, I'm fairly certain
Apache still implements a _WAY_ outdated and inefficient prefork model
that handles one client per process. That doesn't exactly make it a
"good" server, either.

My intention is not to criticize Linux, it has come a long way and the
movement it has driven has, at least in part, resulted in some
interesting software works. Even the various desktop projects have
made significant strides over the past few years. But you have to
remember, a significant number of the "latest and greatest" features
that you see in these projects are just duplicating functionality that
has existed in other operating systems for years. And sometimes rather
poorly.

I realize that this is a Linux user group list, and expect a high
level of advocacy when it comes to your favorite operating system.
Notwithstanding, it is important that you consider that popularlity
does not always indicate something is better. You should especially
not make disparaging remarks about other operating systems if your
knowledge doesn't go further than "people talk about Linux on Slashdot
a lot."

Nathan: as you may have noticed, this is a Linux user group list. I
would advise you to find a MacOSX support list to make such inquiries
to in the future. Assuming you compiled the Apache server from source,
I would advise you to try doing it using darwinports or by downloading
one of the precompiled packages that fink provides.

Thank you

On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:12:08 -0600, Andrew Graupe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And that's why, if linux isn't the best for the desktop, it is still a
> better choice for servers.  And I think desktop will catch up with OS X
> sometime.
> 

-- 
Regards,
Cade Cairns

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca

Reply via email to