Incoming from Cade Cairns: > On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:27:16 -0600, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as I'm concerned, CLUG exists because we're trying to wean > > Dear Internet wizard: > > Thread hijacking results in the inappropriate reuse of the In-Reply-To > identification header, which many modern (ex. not your text-based > program from 1992) mail clients rely on, at least in part, to sort and
Dear Uberhacker: Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13) .................^^^^ btw, isn't Unix from ca. 1974? Oops. Windoze XP is certainly post turn of the century. What the [EMAIL PROTECTED] are you doing running Linux? If you find thread hijacking so objectionable, I suggest you either stick to lists that enforce correct behaviour, or start kill-filing those who insist on offending you. Don't expect grade seven chess club members to be able to keep up with Boris Spassky. There's a time and a place for everything, and clug is not the place to enforce netiquette. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling - - _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
