LOL
* I think this has just been a hijacking of a hijacked thread -- my head is spinning, not to mention my email client ...
* and there is clearly gloating over a small success , in violation of rule number 6) You may be tempted to tell the group of every small success you have but ....
But what I really want to know, was the typing speed test in vi or emacs?
</ducks>
:)
Andrew Graupe wrote:
Aaron Seigo wrote:
On September 29, 2004 17:18, Andrew Graupe wrote:Quite frankly, I'm not concerned who coined it. It's continued use (especially in my *shudder* Infotech 10 class) is a thorn in my side.
You've gone too far.... how dare you use the N word!
maybe he was refering to RFC 1855?
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
;-)
Regards,
Andrew
BTW, trying to not "thread hijack", do you guys know how fast you type? 65WPM gets you 100% automatically in IT10, and I'm getting a consistent 80WPM with no reward.
_______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
_______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca

