Rather than discussing who is right or wrong on the "interpretation" of some 
previous emails, can we get back to the topic at hand??  <grins>

I'm in favor of the more social meeting proposed by Kevin.  However, it would 
need to be carefully managed.  I'm concerned it might devolve into groups of 
friends gathering together, and these groups being exclusionary (albeit, 
unintentionally).  So, I like the idea of having "activity centers" which 
would tend to focus on one or more topic (the activity might be a 
demonstration, or maybe just a group chatting about a specific topic).  Maybe 
have a set period of time (15 or 20 minutes?) where people are encouraged to 
try another activity center?

Shawn

On Friday 05 November 2004 18:53, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> On November 5, 2004 17:08, Jason Louie wrote:
> > I believe what the Email was trying to say is that ultimately the
> > "Board" will be the ones who will be footed with the responsibility of
> > handling the meetings and making things run smoothly.
>

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to