We hijacked that last thread...oops. I sent this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that's the tech support contact on their website). I'd reccomend anyone who is affected to put in a message, maybe they'll do something.
Hi there, I'm writing regarding Shaw's entire network being added to blacklists all over the world. I have a Shaw business internet package, and when I sent a message yesterday, I received a bounce saying: <quote> The Postfix program <email removed>: host mail.zoneedit.com[209.152.174.160] said: 554 � � Service unavailable; Client host [68.147.28.194] blocked using � � l1.spews.dnsbl.sorbs.net; ! [1] shawcable, see � � http://spews.org/ask.cgi?S3163 (in reply to RCPT TO command) </quote> If you visit http://spews.org/html/S3163.html you will see nearly all of Shaw's IP addresses are blocked, the main mail server itself is in danger of being blocked, and there is a comment: �<quote> �Spam ignorant. �Poster child of how not to run a broadband network company �when it comes to dealing with abuse. �</quote> Surely that isn't the reputation Shaw wants. It is simple to implement blocking port 25, and would benefit Shaw greatly. It would, first off, save legitimate business customers this headache. It would cut down network traffic, stopping SPAM traffic in it's tracks. It would also require those running a MX to upgrade to a business package. I would appreciate a reply on this, as it's being followed by some members on the Linux users group here in Calgary, who would like to know if Shaw will take action, or allow their customers to be blacklisted. Thanks, Nick W _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
