On Friday 19 May 2006 11:07, Jesse Kline wrote: > I just got an e-mail that was two days late. I'm not really sure where it's > getting delayed, but here's the header information if anyone wants to take > a look at it: > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from priv-edtnaa04.telusplanet.net ([64.34.111.150]) > by priv-edtnes90.telusplanet.net > (InterMail vM.6.01.05.04 201-2131-123-105-20051025) with ESMTP > id > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >lanet.net>; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:08:44 -0600 > Received: from cpweb14.idig.net (cpweb14.idig.net [64.34.111.150]) > by priv-edtnaa04.telusplanet.net (BorderWare MXtreme Infinity Mail > Firewall) with ESMTP > id B68S4P7AN3; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:08:40 -0600 (MDT)
Why did cpweb14.idig.net receive it from itself? Pardon me if it's obvious to a *nix admin, I'm an Exchange admin and haven't run an open source mail server myself yet. Seems like idig.net had some issues delivering mail? > Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=cpweb14.idig.net) > by cpweb14.idig.net with esmtp (Exim 4.52) > id 1FgTMi-0007z6-0Q; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:15:32 -0700 > Received: from [66.18.230.175] (helo=mail.bddf.ca) > by cpweb14.idig.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52) > id 1FgTMg-0007yz-6C > for [email protected]; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:15:30 -0700 > Received: from [192.168.0.101] (S0106001346471bcf.cg.shawcable.net > [70.72.22.107]) > (using TLSv1 with cipher EXP1024-RC4-SHA (56/128 bits)) > (No client certificate requested) > by mail.bddf.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C682DC093 > for <[email protected]>; Wed, 17 May 2006 15:22:12 -0600 (MDT) > > > _______________________________________________ > clug-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) > **Please remove these lines when replying _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
