D Bhardwaj wrote: >I beg to differ. I don't doubt how heavily the exec might be engaged on this >issue. However, alarm bells are bound to go off, as well as the general >restlessness that seems apparent, when there is little communication 6 months >after the last event. One 'generally' assumes 'annual' events are held at the >same 'time' each year, and, as has been mentioned, they do consume several >months of pre-event tasks. From the 'outside' it does seem 'secretive' as you >put it. Didn't last year's planning sessions lay the ground work? It's easy to >brush off or discount so called 'agony'. However, I think the exec needs to >take 'ownership' of the membership's confusion. Heck, I wasn't 'aware' there >was planning going on. Will there be a 'separate' planning committee? The >north west lug 2007 fest site has a link to CLUG's fest .... but for 2006. But >like you said, all this should be behind us by end of this week. > > I tend to agree, if the communication on this medium is any indication of the groups enthusiasm, there was a lot a couple of months ago, so either the group is waiting patiently for this master plan or we will have a great plan and no willingness to execute. One of the great keys to management is to let people think they arrived at that conclusion all by themselves -- it creates buy-in. As I am just another peon, I wait impatiently for the unveiling of the master plan.
_______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
