Indeed. I threw in my .02 on the site. Hopefully they listen, as the vast majority of comments opposed OOXML.
On Friday 25 May 2007 08:52, bogi wrote: > This is the Microsoft version of things, is it ?? > If it is, than it is only called open to confuse , i think. > Cheers > Szemir > > On May 25, 2007 08:31, Neil Bower wrote: > > Quoted from the Standards Council of Canada: > > > > "FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 2007-05-03 > > OTTAWA —The Standards Council of Canada (SCC) is seeking comments on a > > proposal to adopt Office Open XML (Open XML) as an international open > > standard." > > > > The rest of the press release along with links to additional info can be > > found here: > > > > http://www.scc.ca/en/news_events/pr/pr_details_220.shtml > > > > "The Standards Council of Canada (SCC) is a Crown corporation with the > > mandate to promote efficient and effective use of voluntary > > standardization. It is Canada's representative to the International > > Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International > > Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)." > > > > > > Neil B. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > clug-talk mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) > > **Please remove these lines when replying > > _______________________________________________ > clug-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) > **Please remove these lines when replying _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
