-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dave Bourassa wrote: > Tom Weniger wrote: >> Greetings All, >> >> An interesting perspective on net neutrality for those interested.... >> >> http://www.mises.org/article.aspx?Id=2806 >> > > A powerful, well elucidated argument ... >
I came away with exactly the opposite opinion. Inflammatory rhetoric and "facts" that were not well supported by a guy who did not convince me that he knew what he was talking about. To be fair I am not all that convinced that Ask a Ninja is an authority either :) Most of the opinions on both sides of this argument are by people who have no idea what they are talking about. This is not an issue that can be reduced down to an either or statement, especially by the talking heads that do not actually understand the topic. It is a bad thing to try to force data to support a political position, which is what happens in the link above. For Mr. Swanson his is a political perspective, not a scientific nor technical one. There was an interesting presentation at the last IETF meeting in Vancouver a couple of weeks ago that is more relevant than the link above. Slides can be found here: http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/tsvarea-3/sld1.htm The paper it is based on (worth the read) can be found here: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/tsvwg/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-relax-fairness-00.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHajerwRXgH3rKGfMRAusZAJwKxUDDWN3/6ikB7yG/h6lkm6UvtQCfQLvD DWcf9S02qHlfNRnxlYh8vJw= =RPkK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
