Thanks Mark, That leads me into the 'gotta have all the external 32bit libs' problem though. I've been in a similar place before (create Solaris binaries on Intel) and didn't really like it.
Even though it's massive overkill - I gonna stay with a 32bit VM within my 64bit machine because the approach is simple - and so am I :) Thanks, J.J. On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 18:52 -0600, Mark Carlson wrote: > On 4/26/08, John Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to put a custom server on a 32bit box (AMD K6-3D). I can't > > really use this box to develop on though because Eclipse/KDevelop and > > friends would just kill it. Anyone know of a simple way to use 64bit > > boxes to produce 32bit executables? > > After writing a reply... then googling a second time for less than a > minute, I found this: > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=609592 > > In short: > gcc -m32 > Produces 32-bit code > gcc -m64 > Produces 64-bit code > > I can't try it though, since I don't have any 64-bit environments. > Let me know how it works. > > > I'm going with Ubuntu 32bit within Ubuntu64bit for now. > > -Mark C. > > _______________________________________________ > clug-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) > **Please remove these lines when replying _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
