--- Mark Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --
> > > [29.22](3) Subsection (1) does not apply if the reproduction is made
> onto
> > > a medium that is governed by
> > > Part VIII.
> > > --
> >
> >
> > This would/might make sense if the word 'reproduction' was replaced with
> > 'recording', however that is not the case.
> >
> > Further reading still makes me believe that this clause means that it
> > would be illegal to record purchased audio onto an mp3 player.
> >
> > Simon.
>
> Even an MP3 player which has had the private copying levy applied to
> it? It's all silly anyway, since there was no levy payed for the CPU
> cache, RAM, and Hard Disk which are often intermediate storage.
>
> -Mark C.
I recall a section that covered intermediate storage, legitimizing it
with a very long winded version of as long as rest of what you are doing is OK.
It is section 42 (access control circumvention) that is the bad part of this
bill. I would support the bill if that section was just removed.
Thus the question may be:
What section of the Canadian DMCA act is most egregious?
42
See it works.
(Apologies for the bad Douglas Adams reference.)
--
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying
