k, I read through the ruling... that's a long and dry tome... much like 
a computer manual.. :)

The short and sweet of the ruling:
- the SCOSource licenses were valid for "SCO IP".  This means the 
licenses for Computer Associates and others, AND the Microsoft license 
only cover the intellectual property that SCO owns, so these are off the 
table with regards to Novel.

- The SUN license (2003) was a little different.  In this case, it 
"restated and expanded" an existing SVRX license that SCO did not have 
the right to.  Therefore the Sun license was an SVRX license which Novel 
was entitled royalties for.  However there were other points in the 
license that would not be covered by the SVRX agreements (the APA).  So 
the judge has determined that this expansion of rights wrt SVRX 
constitutes one third of the agreement, which means Novel is entitled to 
one third the value of the license - or 2.5 million.

- Essentially, SCO did not have the authority to grant Sun the rights 
that allowed them to open source OpenSolaris.  So, to my non-lawyer 
eyes, this means OpenSolaris is now under legal limbo until Sun and 
Novel talk to each other and come to an arrangement.

- Novel can request interest on the 2.5 million, and SCO can object if 
it wants.  So this isn't quite over, but the fat lady has sung (with 
regards to the SCO vs Novel case at least), and now it's just paperwork 
(I think).

- Legal fees are to be discussed separately.

So, now maybe we'll see movement in the bankruptcy court, and in the IBM 
case.

Shawn

Shawn wrote:
> For those of you following the SCO saga...
> 
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080716182233901
> 
> Shawn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to