Sorry for the fast send. (darn laptop keeps done phantom mouse clicks when I type. :-)
I meant to say then three machines where: 1. A voting/ballot machine that printed who you voted for in plain text and in a bar code format on one side. (you could then place your ballot in a spiecal holder that only exposed the bar code. 2. A code reader than then read the encoding of the bar code to you. 3. a machine that you placed your ballot into that then counted the votes. The whole point of the system was that since all three machine where simple an open spec. you could acquire them from different vendor and check the results by what they print. This system is comple ignored since it was proven that they where far to cheep to make. -- Chris --- Neil Bower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An interesting article I came across on CBC today. > > "Next-generation Canadian voting technology is making its way on to > the American political stage. > The secure electronic voting system based on cryptographic principles > was conceived at the University of Ottawa about two years ago...." > > http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/10/27/f-lombardi-evote.html?ref=rss > > Cheers! > > Neil B. > > _______________________________________________ > clug-talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) > **Please remove these lines when replying > _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
