Some excellent points, but the reality is that people want & think they
need that integration & simplicity.

I know exactly what you mean about the whole work flow thing.  As I have
been continuing my migration to FLOSS I have been thinking a lot more
about "How" & "Why" I am doing something & trying to find a solution for
that.  And I don't know if I further complicate things by trying to find
solutions that are cross-platform & possibly have smart-phone
integration.  Difficult at times..but can be done.

Example...I am in the process of trying to find a replacement for my 10
year old quicken which is set to blow up soon.  I would like to move to
GNUCash, but there are some aspects that I am struggling with.  As well,
I am trying to bring Lisa more on board with using electronic financial
management.  Trying to combine these things can be interesting.,,but I
think in the end it will be worth it.  I am thinking that the end
results will be that I will need to use a transitional piece to get me
from Quicken to GNUCash...or something else.

On 13-05-01 04:41 PM, Gustin Johnson wrote:
> There are several OneNote like applications, several project management
> suites (open and proprietary) and finally Kontact kicks the crap out of
> Outlook.  If you want you are really asking for is interoperability then
> no, that will probably never happen because it requires cooperation to
> function properly.  
> 
> FLOSS alternatives != (gratis feature copies of proprietary products).
>  In other words, open source software does a whole lot more than just
> clone existing applications.  What is the Microsoft equivalent of the
> Linux kernel?  How about KDE?  What about Citadel, Jenkins, Watir,
> Emacs, Vim... I could go on for hours.  It is helpful to stop thinking
> in terms of applications (what is referred to as modal computing) and
> start thinking in terms of solutions (or put another way, getting
> something done).  
> 
> I really saw this problem in the years that I have been doing "prosumer"
> level audio work on a Linux workstation.  The largest obstacle that
> often gets in the way of new users is that they do not see their
> workflow let alone how change it to suit a new environment.  It would be
> insanity to expect an astronaut to land on Mars without adapting to the
> new environment, or a deep sea diver to not alter his or her behaviour
> on ascent as a result of the environment they are traversing.  At a
> basic level, computing is (not yet) any different.  
> 
> Very few people even think about their workflow regardless of the
> platform in use.  I can't tell you the number of people who left
> frustrated because there was no Linux equivalent to Pro Tools or Cubase
> (actually there is, the problem is that there is no single "app"
> replacement).  Instead of looking to accomplish the steps in their
> workflow, they were looking for a single "app" that was a drop in
> replacement for an "app" on a different platform. It did not matter that
> they could still get to the same end point, they wanted things to stay
> exactly the same, only for free (as in zero cost, most could care less
> about the libre aspect).  Even with that single "app", they still had a
> workflow, they just did not see it.
> 
> Getting drawn into "if only X existed" is a losing battle and a waste of
> time.  In the end find the tools that help you get stuff done.  
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Greg Saunders <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     I don't believe times have changed. Microsoft will play in where
>     there is market share. Android has market share. Linux (desktop)
>     does not. It's unlikely that we'll ever see Office for Linux (not
>     that I want to) because it's improbable that Linux (desktop) will
>     ever have market share in North America.
> 
>     Microsoft is stupid but they'd be downright moronic to overlook the
>     ENORMOUS Android market.
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     clug-talk mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
>     Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
>     **Please remove these lines when replying
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying
> 

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to