Sorry, don't apply this one. I misunderstood the context.
On 09/04/08 14:53, Andrew Price wrote:
> Occurrences of *ptr++ made gcc throw up "operation on 'ptr' may be
> undefined" warnings. This patch adds parentheses to make the order of
> evaluation
> explicit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> gfs2/fsck/fs_recovery.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gfs2/fsck/fs_recovery.c b/gfs2/fsck/fs_recovery.c
> index 3b25dc6..573152e 100644
> --- a/gfs2/fsck/fs_recovery.c
> +++ b/gfs2/fsck/fs_recovery.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int buf_lo_scan_elements(struct gfs2_inode *ip,
> unsigned int start,
>
> sd_found_metablocks++;
>
> - blkno = be64_to_cpu(*ptr++);
> + blkno = be64_to_cpu((*ptr)++);
> if (gfs2_revoke_check(sdp, blkno, start))
> continue;
>
> @@ -218,8 +218,8 @@ static int databuf_lo_scan_elements(struct gfs2_inode
> *ip, unsigned int start,
>
> gfs2_replay_incr_blk(ip, &start);
> for (; blks; gfs2_replay_incr_blk(ip, &start), blks--) {
> - blkno = be64_to_cpu(*ptr++);
> - esc = be64_to_cpu(*ptr++);
> + blkno = be64_to_cpu((*ptr)++);
> + esc = be64_to_cpu((*ptr)++);
>
> sd_found_jblocks++;
>
