Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Christine Caulfield wrote:
Lon Hohberger wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 14:06 +0100, Christine Caulfield wrote:
I don't understand the problem you are trying to fix here. Having
PIC objects in the dynamic library and non-PIC in the static is
perfectly standard practice.
Well, you can't build a loadable module using a static library w/o
building PIC.
Good. Then build against the dynamic one like you're supposed to!
Generally this is right, we still want to ship a working version of the
static one :)
You still haven't said just what it is that is broken about the static
library. Given that my test programs in dlm/tests/usertest all use it,
it can't be totally broken surely ??
--
Chrissie
