Hi Andrew, On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 14:38 +0100, Andrew Price wrote: > Askant would be better off maintained in its own git tree. Python's > distutils provides a sufficient build system for Python modules and > extensions. Splitting out askant into its own tree will allow it to > revert to using that simpler system, as well as avoiding dependencies on > unnecessary packages. It also means one less package to maintain in > gfs2-utils.git. > > A new public git tree for askant will be set up shortly, including the > complete commit history which was discarded when askant was added to > gfs2-utils.
if askant is the only contrib/ package in gfs2-utils.git, then please drop the whole contrib stuff. What are we going to do about STABLE3? The major reason for us to incorporate askant was because of libgfs2 not being a shared lib and it probably won't be for a long time... Fabio
