----- "Fabio M. Di Nitto" <fdini...@redhat.com> wrote:
| automatically. A bit offtopic but perhaps it might be the case to
| revive
| the idea that mount.gfs2 should spawn gfs_controld if required and
| not
| running and libdlm would spawn dlm_controld.
| 
| Fabio

I seem to recall something about getting rid of the mount.gfs2 helper
altogether upstream.

Bob Peterson

Reply via email to