----- Original Message ----- | Hi, | | The rindex structure is identical in size and fields between gfs1 and | gfs2, bar one field name (although the function of that field is | identical in both). Why not just use the gfs2 structure definition? | | Steve.
Hi, You're right: they're the same size. I don't remember why I had the two sizes (apparently wrongly) distinguished in gfs2_edit, but I took that code and ran with it throughout libgfs2. This is apparently unnecessary and I'll remove it in favor of one risize. I still need to move some gfs1-specific structures from gfs2_edit so I'll just redo the patch. Regards, Bob Peterson Red Hat File Systems
