(11.10.27 16:23), Kazunori INOUE wrote: > (2011/10/26 8:30), Lon Hohberger wrote: >> On 09/19/2011 04:32 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote: >>> On 09/13/2011 04:44 AM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: >>> >>>> I attached the patch for this problem. >>>> >>>> * Modified to send a SIGHUP to the primary thread from the secondary >>>> thread detects the start of the VM, and >>>> the primary thread is modified so as to select() the requests from >>>> the VM which started. >>> >>> That's certainly one way of doing it. I might have used >>> 'pthread_cond_singal'. >> >> I am sorry for the delay. >> >> I have a fix based on yours that uses a pipe to wake up select() rather >> than pthread_kill; I'll attach it here. This ends up being a bit lower >> impact, as well; it doesn't require changing the main program - only the >> serial/vmchannel plugin. >> >> Apart from that, the patch here is largely the same. >> >> Let me know what you think at your convenience. >> >> -- Lon > > Hi, Lon > > Thank you for your reply. > I tested this patch, and confirmed that the problem was solved. > (It was good also when four VM (s) was started simultaneously.) > > Many thanks!
Hi, Could you please merge? Regards, Kazunori INOUE
