Hi, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 17:14 +0000, Andrew Price wrote: > On 14/12/11 16:41, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Those look like a good start, but we also need to figure out how to push > > the error handling back into the apps too, > > Yes, I made a tentative start on this a while ago. Each libgfs2 function > which calls exit() will need all of its callers (and their callers, and > their...) updating so it's going to take a fair deal more work. > > If we're agreed on the convention of setting errno and returning > non-zero (or non-valid values) to flag errors, then the way forward is > reasonably clear. > > Andy
Yes, I think that is a good way to do it. The only issues are likely to arise when it is not obvious from this method exactly what has gone wrong. In some cases this is due to doing the checks in the wrong place, or there is some other complication. So its just a case of converting things bit by bit and checking each place individually, which does make it a rather slow job, but I'm not sure there is much alternative, Steve.
