On 16 Apr 2014, at 9:49 pm, Marek 'marx' Grac <[email protected]> wrote:
> --- > fence_sanlock/fence_sanlock.in | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fence_sanlock/fence_sanlock.in b/fence_sanlock/fence_sanlock.in > index dbc0f24..b9f7052 100755 > --- a/fence_sanlock/fence_sanlock.in > +++ b/fence_sanlock/fence_sanlock.in > @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ need to be reset. > </parameter> > </parameters> > <actions> > - <action name="on" /> > + <action name="on" on_target="1" automatic="1" /> I would submit that 'automatic' is a suboptimal choice. It suggests that this value alone is be enough to ensure unfencing occurs. In my view, 'required' better reflects the reality that it is only a hint for a configuration tool to set a cluster option. > <action name="off" /> > <action name="status" /> > <action name="metadata" /> > -- > 1.9.0 >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
