On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:43:13AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 06:20:10 -0700 > Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > > > While doing a bit of adding argument names to fs.h, > > I looked at lm_grant and it seems the 2nd argument > > is always NULL. > > > > How about removing it? > > > > This doesn't apply as it depends on some other patches > > but it should be clear enough... > > > > ACK on the general idea from my standpoint. Anything that simplifies > the file locking interfaces is a good thing, particularly the deferred > locking code.
Fine with me. I'd be happy to remove all the deferred locking code from dlm; it never really worked. Dave