> On 26 Nov 2014, at 10:06 am, Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> wrote: > > On 25/11/14 04:31 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> Yeah, but you're already bringing him for your personal conference. >>> That's a bit different. ;-) >>> >>> OK, let's switch tracks a bit. What *topics* do we actually have? Can we >>> fill two days? Where would we want to collect them? >> >> Personally I'm interested in talking about scaling - with pacemaker-remoted >> and/or a new messaging/membership layer. >> >> Other design-y topics: >> - SBD >> - degraded mode >> - improved notifications > > This my be something my company can bring to the table. We just hired a dev > whose principle goal is to develop and alert system for HA. We're modelling > it heavily on the fence/resource agent model with a "scan core" and "scan > agents". It's sort of like existing tools, but designed specifically for HA > clusters and heavily focused on not interfering with the host more than at > all necessary. By Feb., it should be mostly done. > > We're doing this for our own needs, but it might be a framework worth talking > about, if nothing else to see if others consider it a fit. Of course, it will > be entirely open source. *If* there is interest, I could put together a(n > informal) talk on it with a demo.
Definitely interesting > >> - containerisation of services (cgroups, docker, virt) >> - resource-agents (upstream releases, handling of pull requests, testing) >> >> User-facing topics could include recent features (ie. pacemaker-remoted, >> crm_resource --restart) and common deployment scenarios (eg. NFS) that >> people get wrong. > > > > -- > Digimer > Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ > What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access > to education?
