Em 12-08-2015 07:23, David Laight escreveu:
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Sent: 11 August 2015 23:22
DLM is using 1-to-many API but in a 1-to-1 fashion. That is, it's not
needed but this causes it to use sctp_do_peeloff() to mimic an
kernel_accept() and this causes a symbol dependency on sctp module.

By switching it to 1-to-1 API we can avoid this dependency and also
reduce quite a lot of SCTP-specific code in lowcomms.c.
...

You still need to enable sctp notifications (I think the patch deleted
that code).
Otherwise you don't get any kind of indication if the remote system
'resets' (ie sends an new INIT chunk) on an existing connection.

Right, it would miss the restart event and could generate a corrupted tx/rx buffers by glueing parts of old messages with new ones.

It is probably enough to treat the MSG_NOTIFICATION as a fatal error
and close the socket.

Just so we are on the same page, you mean that after accepting the new association and enabling notifications on it, any further notification on it can be treated as fatal errors, right? Seems reasonable to me.

This is probably a bug in the sctp stack - if a connection is reset
but the user hasn't requested notifications then it should be
converted to a disconnect indication and a new incoming connection.

Maybe in such case resets shouldn't be allowed at all? Because unless it happens on a moment of silence it will always lead to application buffer corruption. Checked the RFCs now but couldn't find anything restricting them to some condition.

Thanks,
Marcelo

Reply via email to