On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Andrew Price <anpr...@redhat.com> wrote: > Add a new rg_skip field to struct gfs2_rgrp, replacing __pad. The > rg_skip field has the following meaning: > > - If rg_skip is zero, it is considered unset and not useful. > - If rg_skip is non-zero, its value will be the number of blocks between > this rgrp's address and the next rgrp's address. This can be used as a > hint by fsck.gfs2 when rebuilding a bad rindex, for example.
How is that better than a resource group size field that wouldn't need to special case the last resource group? Thanks, Andreas
