----- Original Message -----
| Hi,
| 
| 
| On 12/09/17 09:54, tsutomu....@toshiba.co.jp wrote:
| > Hi,
| >
| > This series of patches (2nd version after previous review on August) is to
| > fix various bugs.  This patch set is against the mainline kernel.
| > We'd like reviewed to make sure those changes are fine.
| >
| > Patch number 01/02/03 were posted on this mailing list.
| > However, I've modifed 03 to correct a bug that aquires rwlock multiple
| > times.
| > Other than that, there is no changes.
| >
| > 01:
| > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2017-April/msg00021.html
| > 02:
| > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2017-August/msg00076.html
| > 03:
| > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2017-April/msg00023.html
| >
| > thanks in advance.
| > -- owa
| >
| >
| 
| Many thanks for sending the updated patches. Since the merge window is
| currently open, we are at a good point to look at these, since there is
| maximum time before the next merge window. Perhaps one way to deal with
| these patches would be to take the ones that we are most confident in
| now (of course that could be all of them!) and postpone any that we
| think might need more review until later. That way it should be easier
| to review the more complicated patches and we get the benefit of the
| easier to review patches sooner.
| 
| Dave, Bob, does that make sense?
| 
| Steve.

Hi,

Yes, sounds okay to me.

Bob Peterson

Reply via email to