Hi Steve, On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 11:15, Steven Whitehouse <[email protected]> wrote: > While that looks like a good fix for now, we should look at this again > in due course. Why do we have a ref to the rgrp buffers held here in the > first place? Unless the buffers are pinned in the journal there should > not be a ref held, otherwise they cannot respond to memory pressure,
that should be well enough explained in the 39b0f1e92908 commit message. Under memory pressure, the cached rgrp glocks will eventually be forced out, which will also release those references. Thanks, Andreas
