On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:24 AM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.ker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO socket options use struct timeval
> as the time format. struct timeval is not y2038 safe.
> The subsequent patches in the series add support for new socket
> timeout options with _NEW suffix that are y2038 safe.
> Rename the existing options with _OLD suffix forms so that the
> right option is enabled for userspace applications according
> to the architecture and time_t definition of libc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.ker...@gmail.com>

Looks good overall. A few minor concerns:

The description above makes it sound like there is a bug with y2038-safety
in this particular interface, which I think is just not what you meant,
as the change is only needed for compatiblity with new C libraries
that work around the y2038 problem in general by changing their
timeval definition.

> diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
> index 76976d6e50f9..c98ad9777ad9 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
> @@ -1089,12 +1089,12 @@ static void sctp_connect_to_sock(struct connection 
> *con)
>          * since O_NONBLOCK argument in connect() function does not work here,
>          * then, we should restore the default value of this attribute.
>          */
> -       kernel_setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO, (char *)&tv,
> +       kernel_setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO_OLD, (char *)&tv,
>                           sizeof(tv));
>         result = sock->ops->connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&daddr, addr_len,
>                                    0);
>         memset(&tv, 0, sizeof(tv));
> -       kernel_setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO, (char *)&tv,
> +       kernel_setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO_OLD, (char *)&tv,
>                           sizeof(tv));
>
>         if (result == -EINPROGRESS)

It took me a bit to realize there that this is safe as well even if
we don't use SO_SNDTIMEO_NEW, for the same reason.

> --- a/net/compat.c
> +++ b/net/compat.c
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int compat_sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, 
> int level, int optname,
>                 return do_set_attach_filter(sock, level, optname,
>                                             optval, optlen);
>         if (!COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME &&
> -           (optname == SO_RCVTIMEO || optname == SO_SNDTIMEO))
> +           (optname == SO_RCVTIMEO_OLD || optname == SO_SNDTIMEO_OLD))
>                 return do_set_sock_timeout(sock, level, optname, optval, 
> optlen);
>
>         return sock_setsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen);
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int compat_sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, 
> int level, int optname,
>                                 char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
>  {
>         if (!COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME &&
> -           (optname == SO_RCVTIMEO || optname == SO_SNDTIMEO))
> +           (optname == SO_RCVTIMEO_OLD || optname == SO_SNDTIMEO_OLD))
>                 return do_get_sock_timeout(sock, level, optname, optval, 
> optlen);
>         return sock_getsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval, optlen);
>  }

I looked at the original code and noticed that it's horrible, which of course
is not your fault, but I wonder if we should just fix it now to avoid that
get_fs()/set_fs() hack, since that code mostly implements what you
also have in your patch 3 (which is done more nicely).

I'll follow up with a patch to demonstrate what I mean here. Your third
patch will then just have to add another code path so we can handle
all of old_timespec32 (for existing 32-bit user space), __kernel_old_timespec
(for sparc64) and __kernel_sock_timeval (for everything else).

       Arnd

Reply via email to