Hi Ross, ----- Original Message ----- > > I think the problem may actually be a regression with patch 588bff95c94ef. > > I still hit the assertion with this patch. gfs2_log_write_header() is > unconditionally called and it calls gfs2_log_bmap() which changes > sd_log_flush_head in the success path.
Hi Ross, Okay, it looks like I really screwed up patch 588bff95c94ef. The patch I posted yesterday is grossly inadequate and that code path needs some major fixing. I'm in the process of getting it fixed properly. Sorry I didn't cc you on that last patch. I'll cc you on the new one when it's ready, but it may take a couple hours to get it ready. Regards, Bob Peterson Red Hat File Systems
