On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:33 PM Bob Peterson <rpete...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 7/28/21 1:28 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 7:37 PM Bob Peterson <rpete...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Before this patch, gfs2 rejected mounts attempted with the usrquota, > >> grpquota, or prjquota mount options. That caused numerous xfstests tests > >> to fail. This patch allows gfs2 to accept but ignore those mount options > >> so the tests may be run. > > > > We can't just fake this up. Instead, the fstests need to be fixed to > > skip tests that don't run on particular filesystems. > Hi Andreas, > > I see your point, and sure, the maintainers of xfstests can improve the > tests to make them check whether the options are supported for gfs2 as > they do with other some other options. > > Still, if you look at the man page for "mount(8)" under "Mount options > for affs" you see: > > "grpquota|noquota|quota|usrquota > These options are accepted but ignored. (However, quota utilities may > react to such strings in /etc/fstab.)" > > If you look at "Mount options for jfs" you similarly see: > > "noquota|quota|usrquota|grpquota > These options are accepted but ignored." > > So if affs and jfs can ignore these mount options, why can't gfs2? > Are we planning to support them ever?
Hmm, that's interesting. I don't know what to think about that. Andreas
