This patch move the wake_up() call at the point when a remove message
completed. Before it was only when a remove message was going to be
sent. The possible waiter in wait_pending_remove() waits until a remove
is done if the resource name matches with the per ls variable
ls->ls_remove_name. If this is the case we must wait until a pending
remove is done which is indicated if DLM_WAIT_PENDING_COND() returns
false which will always be the case when ls_remove_len and
ls_remove_name are unset to indicate that a remove is not going on
anymore.
Fixes: 21d9ac1a5376 ("fs: dlm: use event based wait for pending remove")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahri...@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/lock.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index 29e80039e7ca..137cf09b51e5 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -1810,7 +1810,6 @@ static void shrink_bucket(struct dlm_ls *ls, int b)
memcpy(ls->ls_remove_name, name, DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN);
spin_unlock(&ls->ls_remove_spin);
spin_unlock(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].lock);
- wake_up(&ls->ls_remove_wait);
send_remove(r);
@@ -1819,6 +1818,7 @@ static void shrink_bucket(struct dlm_ls *ls, int b)
ls->ls_remove_len = 0;
memset(ls->ls_remove_name, 0, DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN);
spin_unlock(&ls->ls_remove_spin);
+ wake_up(&ls->ls_remove_wait);
dlm_free_rsb(r);
}
@@ -4096,7 +4096,6 @@ static void send_repeat_remove(struct dlm_ls *ls, char
*ms_name, int len)
memcpy(ls->ls_remove_name, name, DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN);
spin_unlock(&ls->ls_remove_spin);
spin_unlock(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].lock);
- wake_up(&ls->ls_remove_wait);
rv = _create_message(ls, sizeof(struct dlm_message) + len,
dir_nodeid, DLM_MSG_REMOVE, &ms, &mh);
@@ -4112,6 +4111,7 @@ static void send_repeat_remove(struct dlm_ls *ls, char
*ms_name, int len)
ls->ls_remove_len = 0;
memset(ls->ls_remove_name, 0, DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN);
spin_unlock(&ls->ls_remove_spin);
+ wake_up(&ls->ls_remove_wait);
}
static int receive_request(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_message *ms)
--
2.31.1
