When transmitting data, call down a layer using a single sendmsg with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to indicate that content should be spliced rather using
sendpage.  This allows ->sendpage() to be replaced by something that can
handle multiple multipage folios in a single transaction.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaul...@redhat.com>
cc: David Teigland <teigl...@redhat.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org>
cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
index 3d3802c47b8b..5c12d8cdfc16 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
@@ -1395,8 +1395,11 @@ int dlm_lowcomms_resend_msg(struct dlm_msg *msg)
 /* Send a message */
 static int send_to_sock(struct connection *con)
 {
-       const int msg_flags = MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL;
        struct writequeue_entry *e;
+       struct bio_vec bvec;
+       struct msghdr msg = {
+               .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL,
+       };
        int len, offset, ret;
 
        spin_lock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
@@ -1412,8 +1415,9 @@ static int send_to_sock(struct connection *con)
        WARN_ON_ONCE(len == 0 && e->users == 0);
        spin_unlock_bh(&con->writequeue_lock);
 
-       ret = kernel_sendpage(con->sock, e->page, offset, len,
-                             msg_flags);
+       bvec_set_page(&bvec, e->page, len, offset);
+       iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, len);
+       ret = sock_sendmsg(con->sock, &msg);
        trace_dlm_send(con->nodeid, ret);
        if (ret == -EAGAIN || ret == 0) {
                lock_sock(con->sock->sk);

Reply via email to