OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp> writes:

> Jeff Layton <jlay...@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> Also, it may be that things have changed by the time we get to calling
>> fat_update_time after checking inode_needs_update_time. Ensure that we
>> attempt the i_version bump if any of the S_* flags besides S_ATIME are
>> set.
>
> I'm not sure what it meaning though, this is from
> generic_update_time(). Are you going to change generic_update_time()
> too? If so, it doesn't break lazytime feature?
>
> Thanks.

BTW, fat is not implementing lazytime now, but it is for future.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>

Reply via email to