On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 23:13 +0000, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 20:43 +0200, Zeeshan Ali Khattak wrote: > > > > Cool! Just what i needed for the media browser that i intend to > > > write. Just one question: > > > > > > > the obvious differences with the GtkTreeModel API is that ClutterModel > > > > favours the lists implementations, > > > > > > Why? > > because we don't feel the need for a generic list+tree abstraction. > personally, I find it very confusing in GTK+ as well. > > it's also a matter of what kind of UIs Clutter targets: on the iPhone or > on small embedded devices I have yet to see a tree-like widget like a > full GtkTreeView showing a GtkTreeStore, for instance; the GtkListStore > is far more common. > > ClutterModel is targeted at tables/lists. if in the future there's some > need for trees, a ClutterModelTree can be added as well.
Maybe ClutterListModel would be a better name then. I imagined that this was some kind of model of the whole stage+actors. And I doubt that you'll never want some other type of data-structure model. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
