On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 15:55 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:32 +0300, Michael Boccara wrote: > > I also think that the current cluttermm should be split into cluttermm, > > clutter-gtkmm, and clutter-cairomm. > > Yes, we will probably do this for cluttermm 0.8.
I'm trying this now. There is one problem. clutter depends on pango, so cluttermm depends on pangomm. But pangomm is not a separate module from gtkmm, though it is a separate shared library. Maybe we can split it out of the gtkmm tarball, but I'll have to think carefully about what that means for API/ABI stability. Also, pangomm depends on cairomm, though pango does not depend on cairo (it depends only on the pango-cairo part of cairo). That's because we did not split cairomm up into cairo-only and cairo-pango parts, to make the C++ API nicer. Hopefully a cairo (and cairomm) dependency is not too bad. What is the big problem with installing gtkmm, by the way? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
