I've uploaded a proposed patch to bug #1099 that would add this function. I
took your suggestion and made it a list of GObject pointers, not a list of IDs.
I've done very basic testing on this patch, but nothing extensive.
I'd have liked to do a diff versus the latest SVN version and just uploaded
an SVN diff, but I'm having trouble building the latest SVN. I think I'm
missing some kind of autoconf-related tools, but the error message is
unhelpful. Anyway, it means I couldn't easily test if I did that. So this
patch is against the very similar-looking 0.8.0 versions of clutter-script.[ch].
I apologize for my patch-fu being weak on this one :-)
--- On Tue, 8/12/08, Noah Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Noah Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [clutter] ClutterScript item list
> To: "Emmanuele Bassi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: clutter@o-hand.com
> Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 12:25 PM
> --- On Mon, 8/11/08, Emmanuele Bassi
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 14:48 -0700, Noah Gibbs wrote:
> > > We're looking at a situation where we might
> get
> > data that is more free-form.
> >
> > I hope you do realize the potential security issues
> that
> > this would
> > entail.
>
> I responded to you in private email about this, and
> mentioned that I knew some of these issues -- we'll need
> to be careful about what GObjects we allow to be
> instantiated, primarily. We're in a situation where we
> both write the ClutterScript files at my company, and have
> the ability to vet what "type" fields are allowed,
> so I believe that we're reasonably safe on this one.
> I'm hoping that if you disagree you'll let me know.
>
> > I can add a method like:
> >
> > gchar **clutter_script_get_ids (ClutterScript
> *script,
> > gsize
> *n_ids);
> >
> > which returns a newly allocated, NULL-terminated array
> of
> > strings.
> >
> > but the ids alone will not give you any detail
> whatsoever
> > on the object
> > they are assigned to; you'll have to fetch the
> object
> > and then check
> > what it is.
>
> This is true. So it might be more useful to get an array
> of GObject pointers instead of an array of IDs. I'd be
> quite happy either way since either would allow me to do
> what I'm trying to.
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe send a mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
