Hi; On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 13:03 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > > I think making it usage explicit and contained like this is really the > > only way to go in we do bring back in support for ARB_texture_rectangle > > without a lot of complexity and other pain elsewhere. > > > > Re devel branch - I dont see why this could not end up in the stable > > branch of which we are already having to track pretty much with mutter. > > My initial expectation was that there would be significant code churn > and API changes, but looking at it, the "remove texture_rectangle > support" patch is a lot smaller than I expected and doesn't look to hard > or intrusive to reintroduce.
Right, it should hopefully be pretty strait forward - all Id request is that we then something like a cogl_enable_legacy_texture_rectangle(boolean) which enables this old logic in texture creation and is well documented as to potential downsides it introduces into apps enabling it. Many thanks; == Matthew -- Matthew Allum, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
