On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:38 +0100, Bastian Winkler wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:26:05AM +0000, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 09:12 +0100, Bastian Winkler wrote: > > > > > using floating point values for sub-pixel precision is IMHO a very good > > > thing, thank you. > > > > thanks. I would have preferred to get this kind of feedback during 0.7, > > but better late than never. :-) > > I know, but unfortunately I had no time to review to review the state of > the bindings until 0.8 was already released.
no worries - as I said, better late than never. I appreciate feedback on pyclutter. and patches, I appreciate them a lot as well. and ponies. > > this change means that I'll have to adapt the C API by hand so it might > > make the pyclutter bindings slightly late in the release process. > > hopefully, though, pyclutter 0.8.2 will come soon. > > Yes, apparently pyclutter needs a lot more manual overrides than other > GObject based python bindings. true. hopefully most of this mess will be solved by gobject-introspection; I really would love to get pyclutter-1.0 out using the gir/typelib files we will ship in clutter-core. > I'd also love to see the cogl texture API in pyclutter. Do you plan to > do this in the future? Or could you give me a hint how to wrap > CoglHandle in python (without ctypes)? the COGL texture API is next on my to-do list. I'll have to add specific, pyclutter-only boxed types for the various CoglHandle types. that should give me enough leverage to use pygobject's own API. otherwise I'll just create some PyObject wrappers and see what happens. ciao, Emmanuele -- Emmanuele Bassi, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
