On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:58 +0000, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > no, it can't. the W3C tidy library shared object is called tidy.so; > also, there's a reason for tidy to use pkg-config, and it's not just for > cosmetic value.
Is it? Fedora (libtidy-0.99.0-17.20070615.fc9.x86_64.rpm): - /usr/lib64/libtidy-0.99.so.0 - /usr/lib64/libtidy-0.99.so.0.0.0 Debian (libtidy-0.99-0_20081224cvs-1_amd64.deb): - /usr/lib/libtidy-0.99.so.0 - /usr/lib/libtidy-0.99.so.0.0.0 - /usr/lib/libtidy.so libtidy (make install): - /usr/lib/libtidy-1.0-so - /usr/lib/libtidy-1.0-so.0 - /usr/lib/libtidy-1.0-so.0.100.0 Am I misinterpreting what you're saying? Regarding pkg-config, are you suggesting a different prefix? > users of tidy should copy it inside their project, since we never made > *any* guarantee on *any* kind of stability -- ABI, or API-wise. we also > never made a release. Tidy is a "toy" toolkit. That's all nice and good, but say, for example, you are developing three clutter projects concurrently. You want to reuse as much as possible, don't you? You don't want your distinct (but similar) projects to have potentially different bugs from having different copies of tidy. --Pat -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
