On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 10:32 -0500, Jason Tackaberry wrote: > 3. If not, is there some alternative approach, equivalent in > functionality, for which a patch would be accepted?
I discovered one possible solution: attach two handlers with clutter_threads_add_idle_full(), one at priority CLUTTER_PRIORITY_REDRAW-10 that waits for the appropriate retrace, and another at priority CLUTTER_PRIORITY_REDRAW that validates the current retrace and unlocks the frame buffer. I don't have a sense yet as to how reliable this method is, however. A 'redraw' signal for ClutterBackend is conceptually cleaner. Cheers, Jason. -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
