Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 11:56 +0100, Michal Kolodziejczyk wrote:
[...]
>> the caller must "know" that and either increase the refcount, or
>> simply discard the pointer. This may be an optimization but is
>> inconvenient, and hasn't changed in 0.9."
>
> the caller doesn't have to do anything of sort. it's not an
> optimization, and it's not "inconvenient". the only inconvenience you or
> Wolfgang are experimenting is not having read the documentation that
> clearly states in at least two different places what a ClutterContainer
> implementation must do in order to be correct.
OK, thanks for the detailed explanation. BTW, we do not implement any
new ClutterContainer, just trying to create bindings automatically. So
the problem could be somewhere else.
Regards,
miko
--
To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
