On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 10:31 -0500, Uday Verma wrote: > Hmmm .. ok, I think I should move my work from 0.8.x to 0.9.x. And > eventually move it to 1.x when it comes out. Do we know when 1.x is > going to be out?
once the cogl-journal batching branch has been merged into master I'll do another release candidate for wider testing. after that, 1.0.0 will be released. I'd say next week or the week of the Gran Canaria Desktop Summit. it would be cool to have the 1.0.0 release done there. :-) > also would we have up to date python binidings with that? :) only after 1.0.0 is out. patches welcome, by the way. ciao, Emmanuele. > Thanks, > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Emmanuele Bassi > <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 15:03 -0500, Uday Verma wrote: > > > Is this is a known issue or is it something I may be doing > > incorrectly? Any workarounds etc.? > > > yes, it's a known issue (the animations are starving the > texture > changes). no, there aren't any workarounds. > > it has been fixed in the current master, but you'll have to > use clutter > 0.9.4 at least, which is a release candidate for 1.0.0. > > ciao, > Emmanuele. > > -- > Emmanuele Bassi, Senior Engineer | > [email protected] > Intel Open Source Technology Center | http://oss.intel.com > > -- > To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected] > > > > > -- > Uday > http://soundc.de/ -- Emmanuele Bassi, Senior Engineer | [email protected] Intel Open Source Technology Center | http://oss.intel.com -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
