Hi Emmanuele, On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 12:14 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > I'm referring to the C API, but I think the C# API will probably look > similar.
Yes, true. But, the main problem is that the documentation and examples are not quite on par with the code sometimes, which is confusing. Which is also the main reason for me to try to update the examples for clutter-sharp - to make it easier for people to start :). > ClutterAlpha's constructor does not take a function any more: it uses > easing modes (an enumeration value). Clear now. The main problem is that the Alpha function accepts an ulong, and not the enum; which is confusing. I will try to fix that (not that experience in invoking c libraries in C#) and make a patch. Another issue arose: while BehaviourOpacity is working, BehaviourPath is not: GLib-GObject-WARNING **: IA__g_object_new_valist: invalid unclassed object pointer for value type `ClutterPath'. I will look into that as well. > since I receive the Bugzilla email for each Clutter bug, I'd like to > point out something that you did and that is always a pet peeve of mine: > do *not* set the target milestone -- it's not something for you to set: > it's for the maintainers and/or QA. the same applies to severity and > priority. Excuse me, not my intention - will refrain from it next time. Maybe remove that field in the bug-enter form anyway? Groeten, Danny Haak -- Product Developer RFID Nedap Retail Support - www.nedaprs.com -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
