>Normally, when I testing the hierarchy exposed, I usually use python >scripts in dogtail. You could try to do that as well, although as >accerciser is failing, probably you would get the same problem (anyway >you don't lose anything trying). >And it is really strange that the cally functions are returning 3 as >the children number but then the accerciser is getting 0.
Choice accerciser is because of accerciser has removed Corba or Bonobo dependency. Dogtail seems still has some dependency to CORBA but not so tightly. So we will try the dogtail on moblin, this will make our communication more easy and from long run I do need an automation tool like dogtail :) Another choice might be the LDTP, as I know LDTPv2 has re-written using pyatspi (cspi is deprecated to atpsi-dbus), and removed the Bonobo dependency. But I haven't tried it yet. >Anyway, after the comments from Sam Quiring I thought that the default >SPI is still the bonobo-at-spi, do you really need to use the dbus >one? Corba inter-process communication protocol is deprecated to Moblin, so move back to Bonobo is not best choice from now on. Although the path to make a workable UI test solution based on ATSPI-dbus is hard considering most of underlying packages are under early development, but I do need to use the dbus one. >But yes, some day I would need to test cally inside mobling, and more >important, using AT-SPI-DBUS. That's great. Thanks! Regards Shuang -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
