Ok, well that clears that up. Glad Intel used an open license. Makes it better for everyone :)
G On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Roman Yazmin <[email protected]>wrote: > I mean you should use clutter as shared library. > .DLL on Windows, .SO on Linux, etc. > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Siji Sunny <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Roman Yazmin <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> But you should use dynamic linking. >>> >>> >>> Can you pls explain what's meant by Dynamic Linking >> >> >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Ross Burton <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 17:20 +0100, Ged Wed wrote: >>>> > Can clutter be used for commercial closed apps. >>>> > i know its GPL. >>>> >>>> Clutter is *LGPL*, so you can use it to write commercial closed >>>> applications. >>>> >>>> Ross >>>> -- >>>> Intel Open Source Technology Centre >>>> http://oss.intel.com/ >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Siji Sunny >> >> >
