Hi there, On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 10:33:51AM +0100, Eric Colleu wrote: > I am just starting a new pure python module based on your beautifull library > ( http://code.google.com/p/pyclutter-widgets/ ).
cool! BTW, there are already some pyclutter based toolkits out there: Glitter [0], Candies [1] and maybe some more. There are also Python bindings to the MX toolkit [2]. > I can see that the clutter core module git is very active but it seems that > the python bindings has not the same activity. Of course, as all the magic is in Clutter while pyclutter's only job is to bring the features of Clutter to the Python language. > Does it mean that pyclutter is dead or sleeping? Since pyclutter-1.0.0: 48 files changed, 9189 insertions(+), 1352 deletions(-) in more than 40 commits doesn't sound dead to me ;) > Is it possible to contribute to pyclutter (for example by wrapping layouts > management)? Patches, bugreports and suggestions are always welcome. Especially the API documentation needs some love. For the current development branch of clutter (1.1 in master) I already wrapped some stuff in a local branch (mainly ClutterBox and LayoutManager), but usually it's not a good idea to wrap an API that's still in heavy development. > if yes, where can I find some developper guide or good practices (for > example on .override file creation, ....)? A guide for creating bindings is at [3]. However, the future of pygobject and friends is pygi [4], which creates bindings to GObject based libraries at runtime. > thanks for your help. > > - Eric - You're welcome :wq buz [0] https://launchpad.net/glitter [1] https://launchpad.net/candies [2] http://netbuz.org/git/mxpy [3] http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-wrap/ [4] http://live.gnome.org/PyGI -- /(bb|[^b]{2})/ GnuPG Fingerprint: 2FFF FC48 C7DF 1EA0 00A0 FD53 8C35 FD2E 6908 7B82
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
